Is the decision by Prince Harry and his wife to step back from the royal family and become financially independent a rebellious move against her mother’s death(princes Diana) or he just got tired of the palace’s “locked way of life”? Would this single action shake Buckingham palace to its foundation?

Home Forums Is the decision by Prince Harry and his wife to step back from the royal family and become financially independent a rebellious move against her mother’s death(princes Diana) or he just got tired of the palace’s “locked way of life”? Would this single action shake Buckingham palace to its foundation?

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 months ago by okpaks nana.
Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #264770 Reply
      Ed N
      Keymaster
    • #264782 Reply
      Edewor
      Guest

      The royal family in England and other royal families all over the world are exploiting the common masses, using their taxes for their own comfort. In addition, several governments pay them royalties for their expensive life styles, marrying several wives and producing huge number of children. Furthermore, they get a lot of land sales royalties to support their themselves and families while the ordinary citizens are experiencing very severe hardship. Prince Harry’s action and decision is long over due. Sincerely, it is time to stop supporting these exploiters and move on in a better direction. The British racism geared towards Africans has finally been exposed.

      Truly, this British royal institution has been exploiting the Britons and the rest of the world for a very long time. Prince Harry and his wife decision to separate themselves from this locked-down institution should be applauded and expanded to all nations. The kings and Queens and Ivies, and Obas, and Emirs who cannot support themselves through tourisms should be shutdown completely…..enough is enough! We are in the year 2020, how can these pre, peri and post medieval era civilization still be in charge? Personally, it is time to erase all these non productive and expensive institutions. The paradigm shift is now, thanks to prince Harry. Besides, no one told us the details of their mother’s death; that is enough reason for one of her sons to grow up and rebel against the umbra activities in Buckingham palace.

      Evidentially, all the palaces across the world behave and conduct their events in a cult-like fashion. Obviously, we are tired of all these secrecies and covertness practiced in many royal enclaves globally. The concept of “I am above the law” is obsolete and a thing of the past and should be committed to annals of his history. Statistically, I have been studying the history of the royalties on earth, their characteristics are very similar…… oppressive, dictatorial and exploitative. Boldly, I am not created into this world to be oppressed, exploited and dictated to in any form and shape. Prince Harry, we got your back and we are praying for you and your family; you will make it big without Buckingham palace. I rest my cerebral! Welcome to https://www.provocativedebate.com.

       

    • #264820 Reply
      Michael
      Guest

      The British royal system is one of the most respected in the world today. Under the royal leadership of Britain, the country has committed Gazzilion crimes around the world during colonial era. Majority of the gold, diamonds, artworks and other valuables were looted and brought to Buckingham palace. Presently, as we debate, the beautiful artworks stolen from Benin city(Nigeria) in 1897 are stored permanently there. Power, bullying and stealing cannot last forever. The locked down approach of the British monarchy is finally uncoded by the brave movement of prince Harry and his wife, Meghan.

      Sincerely, the British tabloids succeeded in chasing prince Harry, his black wife and baby away from his country. All Britons should be ashamed of themselves for descending so low to uproot a prince from his palace without firing a single bullet. Bad enough, they were dealing with a man of valor and wisdom; with a choice to make. Rightly, he choosed his family over titles and public exploitations. Surely, it takes a real man to make such a social clinical decision to gain his freedom and that of his family. What crime did the prince commit? I guess marrying a black woman (a very beautiful one); bringing her into the palace was the genesis of his crime. Shame on those primitive people with their medieval cerebral and way of life.

      Civilization is not static; people will invariably make moves to redefine an old system. Historically, it takes but one intelligent Homo Sapien Bipedalist to shift the archaic paradigm. My respect goes to the Queen for resolving the conundrum without displaying any dirty laundry out for the tabloids to feed on. Either way, this is a historic moment; it will be chronicled in global history. Currently, the social media are buzzing with this narrative; I strongly believe that people are pleased with Harry’s decision.

    • #264857 Reply
      okpaks nana
      Guest

      The English royal family is conservative and dictatorial in nature. They regard opposition as a threat and will do anything to take opposition or rebel off their way. The staged killing of Princess Diana of Wales is a testimony to this fact. This royal kingdom reap tax payers hard earned money in almost all their former colonies while they live in stup

    • #264858 Reply
      okpaks nana
      Guest

      The English royal family is conservative and dictatorial in nature. They regard opposition as a threat and will do anything to take opposition or rebel off their way. The staged killing of Princess Diana of Wales is a testimony to this fact. This royal kingdom reap tax payers hard earned money in almost all their former colonies while they live in stupendous luxury. British is what it is today as a result of the huge looting of agricultural and natural resources in Africa.

      Logically, the decision of Prince Harry and his spouse to renounce royal tittles is commendable and also an eye opening to citizens of exploitative kingdoms all over the World. This whole episode began when Prince Harry married a black lady. The English empire have hitherto criticized racism in public but their pretenssive position has been exposed.

    • #264859 Reply
      okpaks nana
      Guest

      The English royal family is conservative and dictatorial in nature. They regard opposition as a threat and will do anything to take opposition or rebel off their way. The famous staged killing of Princess Diana of Wales is a testimony to this fact. This royal kingdom reap tax payers hard earned money in almost all their former colonies while they live in stupendous luxury. British is what it is today as a result of the huge stealing of agricultural and natural resources in Africa.

      Logically, the decision of Prince Harry and his spouse to renounce royal tittles is commendable and also an eye opening to citizens of exploitative kingdoms all over the World. This whole episode began when Prince Harry married a black lady. The English empire have hitherto criticized racism in public but their pretending position has been exposed. It’s demeaning for a revere empire of this magnitude to toll this part.

      Empirically, most royalties in the world have exercised similar treats to that of the British empire. Obviously, Prince Harry must have been fed up with numerous covert conspiracy in the royal family, including the arranged killing of his mum and of course, it’s morally upright if he decide to free himself and his family from the shackles of darkness. This action will no doubt, vibrate the foundation of the royal family.  Royalties all over the world most reverse their conservative, exploitative and dictatorial ideology to embrace true democracy and inclusiveness in all ramification. May God protect, guide and provide for Prince Harry and his family as they toll a new part of life….

Viewing 5 reply threads
Reply To: Is the decision by Prince Harry and his wife to step back from the royal family and become financially independent a rebellious move against her mother’s death(princes Diana) or he just got tired of the palace’s “locked way of life”? Would this single action shake Buckingham palace to its foundation?
Your information: